In the global space race, the US and UK present contrasting profiles.
While both nations are propelled by a shared vision of advancing scientific knowledge and capitalising on the commercial potential of space, their paths diverge significantly due to disparities in growth, resources, and working practices. This divergence is more than a mere observation – it’s a phenomenon that warrants a deeper examination.
At EVONA, our journey over the past five years has given us a unique vantage point to observe these differences. Since our inception in 2018, an overwhelming 80% of our work has naturally occurred in the United States, a fact that underscores the undeniable skew in the international global space landscape. This US monopoly on our operations isn’t an isolated incident – it seems to reflect wider industry patterns.
This disparity between the two nations raises intriguing questions. Why does the UK lag behind the US in terms of space industry advancements? Could the UK’s working practices be an unseen barrier to its growth? We’re compelled to explore these questions further.
GROWTH
When assessing the growth trajectory of the space sector in both the US and UK, the scale tilts significantly in favour of the former. The US, known for its innovative spirit and forward-thinking approach, has had an accelerated growth trajectory in space exploration and commercialisation. The US space industry has expanded at an impressive pace, driven by a combination of public and private investments, as well as the audacious goals set forth by NASA and companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin.
The UK, despite being home to some of the world’s top scientific minds and institutions, has not experienced the same pace of space industry growth. The country has, however, marked notable progress, especially in the field of satellite technology. The UK ranks as the second-largest manufacturer of satellites globally, with Scotland playing a critical role.
Yet, even while coming in a close second to California in satellite production, the UK is still missing a crucial piece of the puzzle: domestic launch capability. Without it, satellites built in the UK must journey overseas for their launches, casting a shadow over the country’s significant contributions to the industry. This necessity of outsourcing satellite launches could indeed obscure the visibility and impact of the UK’s achievements within the sector.
In terms of broader growth in the space sector, the UK’s pace remains slower than that of the US. The UK’s space industry is still maturing, navigating through rapidly evolving technological landscapes and increased global competition. The slower pace can be attributed in part to the UK’s more cautious, measured approach, which contrasts sharply with the US space sector’s growth fuelled by robust funding, visionary leadership, and a culture that embraces risk-taking.
To appreciate the scale of this difference, consider NASA’s ambitious Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the Moon and set the stage for further exploration to Mars. This daring endeavour embodies the spirit of the US space sector, its quest for breakthroughs, and its pursuit of daring goals. On the other hand, the UK’s space sector is steadily reinforcing its presence, leveraging its strengths, and aspiring to secure a more significant foothold in the international space race. It’s a slower, but steady ascent that carries its own unique potential and promise.
Regardless, the key question lingers – how can the UK accelerate its growth and establish a stronger presence in the space ecosystem? Is it through revising strategic focus, increasing funding, or modernising working practices? The unfolding journey in the global space race will ultimately reveal the answers.
RESOURCES & FUNDING
The resource and funding differences between the US and the UK space sectors underscore the scale of the Atlantic Divide. The significant disparity in financial muscle between the US and UK underscores the differing pace and scale of their space ambitions. As we delve deeper into their funding strategies, we can better understand the constraints and opportunities that shape each nation’s trajectories in space exploration and innovation.
The Biden-Harris Administration’s Fiscal Year 2024 budget includes substantial funding for NASA, fostering American space exploration and innovation.
- The budget sets aside $8.1 billion for NASA’s Artemis I mission, laying the groundwork for a long-term human presence on the Moon and future Mars exploration.
- An investment of $949 million is allocated for the U.S.-led Mars Sample Return mission, aiming to return rock and soil samples from Mars, enhancing understanding of the solar system.
- Nearly $2.5 billion is devoted to Earth Science, including the Earth System Observatory, providing open access data on climate change and natural hazards.
- Over $500 million is invested in technology innovations to reach net-zero carbon emissions in the aviation sector by 2050.
- An additional $1.39 billion supports research and development of new technologies to advance space exploration and stimulate the growth of commercial space companies.
- The budget allocates $158 million to NASA’s Office of STEM Engagement, with an aim to inspire the Artemis Generation and create opportunities for students from underrepresented communities.
- The budget is designed to offset its own investments by reducing deficits over the next decade, demonstrating fiscal responsibility.
On the other side of the Atlantic, the UK Space Agency’s budget is a mere £469 million.
The UK Space Agency’s Corporate Plan 2022-25 outlined a strategic concentration of its resources on several key points. These initiatives are designed to stimulate investment into the UK’s space sector, execute missions that cater to the nation’s requirements, and broaden our comprehension of the universe. Additionally, they aim to promote the advantages of space-related activities to investors, clients, and future scientists and engineers.
In adhering to these priorities, the UK Space Agency plans to reinforce cross-government activities. This collaborative approach is expected to help fulfil the initial commitments laid out in the National Space Strategy’s 10 Point Plan:
While the UK’s investments are significant, its total budget spread over three years is less than the US’s single-year budget for its Artemis program alone. This difference showcases not only the financial might of the United States, but also exposes a potential shortfall in the UK’s space ambitions.
Despite operating on a comparatively leaner budget, the UK’s space strategy reflects balance and foresight. It underscores the nation’s commitment to a multi-faceted approach to space exploration, spanning sustainability, innovation, and socio-economic equality. Yet, a larger budget could be the boost the UK needs to remain competitive in the speed and extent of its space ambitions.
In June 2023, the UK Space Agency announced multiple funding programs to boost their domestic space industry. The UK Space Agency’s Enabling Technologies Programme, part of the National Space Innovation Programme, aims to support UK businesses pioneering technologies that can enhance spaceflight capabilities.
The total of £2.1 million is divided across nine projects. It will be followed by several funding rounds open to commercial entities, academic institutions, and not-for-profit organisations that promise to deliver groundbreaking technologies and elevate UK space capabilities.
The funded projects represent various aspects of space technology, including fields such as space-based solar power, extreme ultraviolet integral field spectroscopy, electrothermal propulsion, and optical communications.
Despite these efforts, the need for a more substantial budget is evident. The financial comparison between the UK and US paints a clear picture: strategic allocation is critical, but without a significant financial commitment, the UK risks being outpaced in the global space race.
WORKING PRACTICES
When you pull back the curtain on the employment practices in the US and UK, it’s evident that their distinctive approaches contribute significantly to the unique pace of their respective space industries.
In the US, job seekers in the space sector far outnumber available roles, resulting in a vibrant and fiercely competitive market. This density of talent points to an industry that’s brimming with energy and ambition. In contrast, the UK embodies a more harmonious balance between job seekers and openings, resulting in a less intense and more measured market landscape.
Hiring processes also differ significantly. While the US favours efficiency and rapid results, the UK leans towards a more meticulous, unhurried approach. These contrasting strategies are a reflection of broader cultural norms within the two nations. The US, driven by a culture of rapid growth and quick returns, tends to expedite the hiring process. The UK, with a more traditional business culture emphasising stability and long-term planning, takes a more meticulous approach. This difference in speed could be a factor in the UK’s slower industry growth.
When it comes to bringing in new talent, US companies tend to see recruitment agencies as a smart investment in their future growth. The UK, however, often views these services as an avoidable expenditure. This conservative stance could potentially stifle the rate of progress in the UK.
In the realm of employment conditions, there’s a stark contrast too. In the US, many employees work ‘at-will,’ meaning they can part ways with their employer, or vice versa, at any moment. This can foster a sense of urgency and diligence among workers who feel their position could evaporate overnight. Contrastingly, UK workers usually have greater job security and standard benefits, like the NHS, easing some of the pressures felt by their US counterparts.
Pay is another arena where disparities come to light. The US offers significantly higher salaries, reflecting robust financial backing for the industry and high value attributed to skilled workers. Conversely, in the UK, salaries can be considerably less, even for those possessing advanced degrees.
And finally, public engagement with the space industry differs significantly. In the US, space exploration is a source of national pride, thanks to their history of iconic achievements, like landing a man on the Moon. In the UK, however, public engagement with the space industry is less noticeable, particularly among those not directly involved in the industry. This could sway both industry investment and the morale of industry workers.
Ross Crosby, EVONA’s Head of Contract, shared his insights on this comparison, “The UK space sector has a unique balance and a steadfast commitment to quality – that’s our strength. But, we also see the need for a shakeup. We have to weave in some of that audacious spirit that we see in the US space industry. While holding on to our core strengths, we’ve got to speed up our hiring, cast our nets wider for global talent, and develop a bigger appetite for risk-taking. It’s time to cultivate an environment that champions ambitious space ventures, driven by a diverse and talented workforce.”
In sum, the US space industry presents a bold, brisk, opportunity-laden landscape, whereas the UK’s methodical, risk-averse approach, though steady, may need an injection of audacity to compete at the global level. The contrasting work ethics, pay scales, and levels of public engagement ultimately define the trajectories of these two nations in the space industry.
STEPS FORWARD
While the US has a firm footing in the space industry, the UK, despite its modest size, has a unique set of strengths and opportunities that can help narrow the Atlantic divide. Here’s a look at some potential ways forward for the UK:
- Enhance Funding: Boosting the investment in the UK’s space sector is a fundamental first step. Increased funding can fuel innovative research and development, facilitate the upskilling of the workforce, and promote the growth of domestic space companies. Government, private sector, and international collaborations can be explored to secure these additional funds.
- Develop Domestic Launch Capability: Building on its impressive success in satellite manufacturing, the UK can work towards developing its own domestic launch capability. This would not only bring added prestige and visibility to UK space activities but also create jobs and stimulate economic growth. To achieve this, fostering partnerships between academia, the government, and the private sector could be key.
- Cultivate an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: The UK can learn from the US’s entrepreneurial spirit. Encouraging a risk-taking, bold approach in the UK’s space sector could fuel faster growth and progress. This might involve creating favourable policies for space startups, providing grants or tax incentives, and setting up incubators or accelerators dedicated to space technologies.
- Revamp Hiring Practices: Modernising the hiring process can attract more global talent and fresh ideas. Embracing efficient hiring strategies and viewing recruitment agencies as strategic growth partners, rather than an unnecessary expense, could be transformative. The UK could also consider attracting international talent through competitive salary packages and benefits, similar to the US model.
- Increase Public Engagement: Boosting public interest in the space industry could spur further investment and create a nurturing environment for the next generation of UK space scientists and engineers. This could involve initiatives such as public lectures, space exhibitions, school partnerships, and more extensive media coverage of the UK’s space achievements.
- Promote Collaboration and Innovation: Collaboration and innovation are key drivers of growth in any sector. The UK can prioritise joint initiatives with other countries, academia, and the private sector to speed up innovation. Also, research and development focused on the commercial applications of space technologies can stimulate growth and ensure the UK’s space industry stays competitive.
- Focus on Sustainability: As we look to the future, the sustainability of space activities is becoming increasingly important. The UK could lead the way in developing cleaner, more efficient space technologies and advocating for responsible practices in space, such as space debris mitigation.
Undeniably, the UK’s space sector has a compelling journey ahead. Although the scale of the industry may not match that of the US currently, it has the building blocks necessary for growth and the potential to evolve into a significant global player. It’s a dynamic landscape ripe for innovation and progress.
With increased investment, strategic alliances, transformative hiring practices, public engagement, and a focus on sustainability and innovation, the UK’s future in the global space race can be bright. This isn’t a sprint, but a marathon, and the UK, with its measured but steady strides, is demonstrating its commitment to shaping a sustainable and inclusive future for space exploration.
University of Maryland, US 
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Location: Los Angeles, California
Listed as 21.8% of SATCOM companies’ top field of study, electrical and electronics engineering is the bedrock of SATCOM. Electrical engineers are the trailblazers who design, develop and manage the components essential to the operation of satellites. This includes power systems, telemetry devices, and other components, all of which are built to perform consistently in the harsh, unforgiving realities of space. Alongside them, electronics engineers masterfully craft miniature circuits and devices, optimising satellite weight and size while amplifying functionality. Together, this discipline forms a vanguard that consistently pushes technological boundaries in SATCOM.
Computer science, at 14.1%, is an indispensable cornerstone in the SATCOM industry. It’s computer scientists who design and optimise the intricate algorithms and data structures that satellites rely on for their operation. They work tirelessly to ensure secure and efficient communication between space and earth, maintaining the integrity and accessibility of the massive amounts of data satellites handle. With their expertise, satellites become more than hunks of metal in orbit—they become sophisticated instruments capable of advancing humanity’s reach and understanding.
With a substantial 9.8%, computational science – not to be confused with computer science – plays a pivotal role in the SATCOM industry. Computational science is an interdisciplinary field that uses computer science techniques, mathematical models, and simulations to solve complex problems in various scientific disciplines. It involves the practical application of computer science and mathematics to real-world problem solving. This discipline leverages the power of computational tools to simulate and solve complex physical problems associated with satellite communications. By creating models of intricate situations and systems, computational scientists offer invaluable insights into satellite design, performance optimisation, and risk mitigation. They are the analytical powerhouses who help us navigate the complexities of creating and managing advanced satellite systems.
Mechanical engineering, standing firm at 9.8%, brings pragmatism to the innovative world of SATCOM. These engineers concentrate on the physical systems within a satellite, focusing on aspects like thermal control and mechanical structures that maintain the satellite’s physical integrity. Their work ensures that satellites can withstand the harsh conditions of space for extended periods, thereby enhancing the longevity and reliability of our space-based communication networks.
Carrying a significant 9.5% of the weight, Aerospace, Aeronautical, and Astronautical Engineering builds the backbone of the SATCOM industry. These talented engineers design, construct, and test the spacecraft that eventually transform into our communication satellites. They are the bridge between theoretical designs and tangible, functioning satellites, their work allowing us to reach beyond the confines of our planet and into the celestial unknown.
Holding 7.3% of the field, specialists in computer systems networking and telecommunications ensure that our planet remains interconnected. They design and implement the networks that facilitate seamless communication between satellites and earth stations. Their efforts transform a collection of individual devices into an integrated global web, keeping the world linked, no matter how remote the location.
At 7.3%, specialists in electronics are indispensable to the SATCOM sector. These experts are responsible for the intricate electronic components that keep satellites functional. Through their meticulous work, they ensure that every signal, every byte of data, is transmitted and received correctly, enabling a symphony of seamless communication that spans the globe.
Industrial engineers, also at 7.3%, bring a unique and practical perspective to the SATCOM industry. Their role is to enhance operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness within the sector. They ensure processes are streamlined, resources optimised, and that the production and operation of satellites remain economically viable. Their ingenuity in creating sustainable and efficient systems is a crucial contributor to the long-term growth and environmental responsibility of the industry.
Finally, accounting for 7% of specialities, telecommunications engineering is vital to the efficient operation of SATCOM systems. These engineers manage the precious spectrum resources, promoting their efficient and effective usage. Their mastery prevents a chaotic scramble for bandwidth and ensures orderly, reliable communication channels.
Kick-starting your career in the exciting realm of SATCOM is an exhilarating prospect, and having EVONA as your partner can give you a significant advantage. As a leading specialist in space industry staffing, we have an intimate understanding of the industry and a deep network of connections with innovative organisations driving SATCOM evolution.
In recruitment, biases can lead to generalizations that determine the right candidate for a job based not on their skills, but on factors such as their name or nationality. A study by Raconteur found that white British applicants received a positive response from employers 24% of the time, compared to only 15% for ethnic minority applicants with identical CVs and cover letters. Another research showed that resumes featuring white-sounding names are 50% more likely to get an interview than ethnic-sounding names, even with identical qualifications. Gender biases are also common, with certain roles historically attracting one gender over another, such as female nurses or male engineers. This not only suppresses diversity but also impedes the industry’s capacity for innovation and problem-solving.
The presence of unconscious bias within team dynamics erodes collaboration and productivity. Employees subjected to prejudice may feel alienated, leading them to withhold valuable ideas and solutions. This sense of exclusion can result in disengagement, which translates to considerable losses for organizations. In fact, a study by Coqual revealed that employees who perceive bias are 2.6 times more likely to report having withheld ideas and market solutions during the previous six months. Addressing and mitigating unconscious bias is essential to foster a supportive and inclusive environment where all team members can contribute effectively, ultimately driving the success of the organization.
A company culture pervaded by unconscious bias fosters an environment where stereotypes are perpetuated and specific groups are marginalized. Shockingly, 48% of African American women and 47% of Latina women have reported being mistaken for administrative or custodial staff, highlighting the prevalence of harmful stereotypes. Such bias also impacts employee retention, as those who perceive bias in the workplace are more likely to consider leaving their current job within the year. Moreover, the financial implications of workplace bias are substantial, as it contributes to the loss and replacement of over 2 million American workers annually due to unfairness and discrimination. Addressing unconscious bias is, therefore, crucial not only for promoting a diverse and inclusive work environment, but also for reducing the considerable financial burden it places on organizations.
Performance evaluations, promotion, and career advancement are areas where subconscious bias can have significant impacts on employees and employers. Biases may influence how employees are assessed, with some individuals being undervalued or overvalued based on factors unrelated to their actual job performance. A study published in the American Economic Review found that women received 14% lower performance ratings than men with similar performance in male-dominated occupations. This negatively impacted their promotion rates and career advancement opportunities. Additionally, the 2021 Women in the Workplace report by McKinsey & Company and LeanIn.Org found that women held only 38% of managerial positions in the United States, and women of color held a mere 12% of these positions, demonstrating barriers to career advancement for underrepresented groups.
When subconscious bias results in discriminatory practices, employers may face legal repercussions. According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency received 67,448 charges of workplace discrimination in the fiscal year 2020. Although this figure is lower than previous years, it highlights the ongoing presence of discrimination and bias in the workplace. In the same year, the EEOC secured $439.2 million for victims of discrimination through voluntary resolutions and litigation. This underscores the significant financial and reputational risks for organizations that fail to address subconscious bias and discriminatory practices.
Addressing unconscious bias in the space sector is crucial for fostering an inclusive and innovative industry. Here are several strategies companies can implement:
The attributes that can contribute to diversity are practically endless. Not all of these characteristics can be readily observed.
When it comes to disability inclusion, It’s important to understand not all disabilities are visible. They can range from mental health conditions to chronic pain or learning disabilities, which are often misunderstood or overlooked in the workforce.
on diversity and inclusion in the sector.
We spoke to Chris Bell, EVONA’s senior technical recruiter, about his unique perspective on ND inclusive recruitment.
A 2021 by McKinsey found that corporations identified as more diverse and inclusive are 35% more likely to outperform their competitors.
According to a report by People Management, teams with diverse backgrounds and experiences are 87% more effective at making decisions. The report indicates that gender-diverse teams make better business decisions 73% of the time, while teams consisting of individuals from different age groups and geographic locations make better decisions 87% of the time.
A company’s reputation and market position can be significantly influenced by its commitment to diversity and inclusion. Today’s consumers are increasingly conscious of the values held by the organizations they support, and many prefer to align themselves with businesses that prioritize inclusivity. A diverse and inclusive workforce can help a company appeal to a broader customer base, ultimately boosting brand loyalty and market share. By championing diversity, space organizations can enhance their reputation and solidify their position as industry leaders.
As the space industry continues to grow and evolve, it must adapt to the changing global landscape. Demographic shifts, technological advancements, and new market demands are all shaping the future of the industry. By embracing diversity and inclusion, space industry companies can better understand and respond to these changes, ensuring they are well positioned to thrive in the coming years.
We spoke to Eric Ingram, CEO and co-founder of 
EVONA’s digital and direct marketing manager, Danni, is living proof of the importance of disability inclusion.
But what does ‘value diversity’ mean? It doesn’t mean numbers. It doesn’t mean statistics. It means understanding employees’ needs and providing equity across the organisation. It means inclusion.
