How to Show Flight Heritage on Your Space Resume

An RF engineer who has taken a system from an idea on paper all the way to flight is rare. Rare enough that we could put that person forward to three of our clients and expect three offers. That’s flight heritage. Many engineers have the experience, but it’s not clear from their resumes. And others are closer to it than they realize.

How does a hiring manager choose between two RF engineers with the same skill set at the offer stage? Often, it comes down to what they’ve built that’s in space right now.

What Is Flight Heritage?

Flight heritage means hardware or software has already flown in space and done its job. Engineers measure this on NASA’s Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale, which runs from 1, where the basic science has been observed, to 9, an “actual system flight proven through successful mission operations.” TRL 8 is one step short: qualified through testing, but not yet flown.

In hiring, flight heritage is shorthand for engineers who have taken their work from early design all the way to orbit. Hiring managers want to know what you owned and how far it got. That matters more to them than your job title or your employer.

Why Do Space Hiring Managers Care About Flight Heritage?

Once something launches, you can’t send an engineer up to fix it. Ground testing gets close, but some stresses can only be fully validated in orbit.

Engineers who have seen their work through to flight know which problems tend to surface just before launch, because they’ve lived through the late design changes and test failures themselves. Companies want that experience, and the engineers who have it rarely need to look for a new job. They’re usually in good roles at good companies, often with equity they’d be leaving behind.

Why Doesn’t a Big Name on Your Resume Prove It?

Hiring managers notice a big name on a resume. The important thing is what you built there, and whether any of it flew.

Some of our startup clients ask for engineers from SpaceX or another big name, partly because it reassures their investors. But large teams split the work into narrow pieces. You can spend years on one part of one subsystem, even in a senior role. 

Technical leads at bigger companies also aren’t always as hands-on as their startup counterparts, especially once they start managing people. A startup hiring its first engineers needs someone who can lead a technical area and build the product.

If you’re at a large company with stock still vesting, weigh a move to a startup on what you’d own there, as well as what you’d leave behind. 

How Do You Show Flight Heritage on Your Resume?

If you’ve done the work, make sure it’s visible on your resume. Here’s how:

Lead With What You Owned

Job titles vary so much between companies that they don’t mean much without context. When we search for RF engineers by title, we get telecom engineers too, so we search by what people have done. Hiring managers read your resume the same way. Under each role, start with the system or subsystem you were responsible for.

Show How Far It Got

Name the stages you took your work through, from design and build to test, integration, launch and operations. If it flew, say so, and say whether it’s still operating. If the program stopped before launch, say how far you got.

Say Whether You Led or Supported

Jules Haehn, a former principal technical recruiter at Vast, has some great resume advice for space engineers. He asks candidates: “Did you play a leading or supporting role in your projects?” Both are worth listing. Just make the difference clear, because a hiring manager will ask. Verbs like “owned” and “led” read differently from “supported” and “contributed to”.

Put a Number on It

Haehn says most of your bullet points should include a metric. In space, that could be how many test campaigns you ran, or how long your hardware has been operating in orbit. Compare these two lines: 

  • “RF Engineer, satellite communications team”
  • “Led the RF design for a communications payload from early design through testing and launch. It’s been operating in orbit for two years.”

The second one tells the hiring manager what they want to know before they ask.

Add a Portfolio

Keep your resume short. Haehn suggests a separate portfolio with one or two slides per project, covering the objectives, requirements, your contribution, the results and what you learned. It gives you room for detail that won’t fit on a resume.

Stay Inside Your NDA

A lot of space work is covered by export controls or non-disclosure agreements. You can usually describe your role and how far the work got without naming the customer or sharing technical detail. If you’re not sure, check with your current employer what you’re allowed to say.

Look Beyond Your Day Job

If your current role only covers a narrow slice of a system, look for other proof. Time on a small, fast-moving team, or something you built on your own time, is evidence you can own more than your job description. Haehn also recommends adding side projects to your portfolio.

What If Your Experience Stops Short of Flight?

Maybe your program was cancelled before launch, or you haven’t been on one long enough to see it fly. You’re still in the running for plenty of space roles.

In small talent pools, some hiring managers know that asking for an exact match will cost them candidates. They’ll look at engineers who cover most of what the role needs, especially when you can learn the missing skills on the job.

If you haven’t seen a system through to flight yet, lead with the furthest stage you reached: qualification testing, integration, or a program that got to TRL 8 before it stopped. Then look for a role where you’ll own a system all the way to launch. That’s more likely at a smaller company, where teams are lean and engineers cover more of the lifecycle. It’s also where a step up into a lead or principal role tends to come sooner.

Make Your Flight Heritage Easy to Find

Flight heritage is proof that something you worked on made it to orbit and did its job. A hiring manager won’t see that from your job title or a company name, so spell it out on your resume.

If you’re thinking about where that experience could take you next, take a look at the space roles we’re hiring for right now.

How to Judge a Space Startup’s Equity Offer

A founder tells you your 0.5% could be worth $5 million one day. Before you count on it, you need to know how much of that you’d actually keep, and what has to happen first.

If you’re interviewing at a space startup and want to understand the equity on offer, this blog is for you. In it, we cover how equity works and the questions to ask a founder before you sign on the dotted line. 

Startup offers often pair equity with a lower salary than you’d earn at a bigger company. If you’re still deciding whether that trade works for you, start with our guide to weighing startup equity against salary.

How Space Startup Equity Works: Vesting, Cliffs and Dilution

Most space startup offers include equity: a grant of shares or stock options, often described as a percentage of the company. That percentage is where the conversation starts. How much of it you actually get depends on the terms of the agreement. These are the ones to understand before you sign, using Index Ventures’ guide to employee equity as the reference point:

  • Vesting: you don’t get all your shares on day one. You earn them over time, usually a period of four years. Most companies also set a one-year cliff, a waiting period before anything vests. If you leave before your first year is up, you walk away with nothing. Once you reach the one-year mark, a quarter of your shares vest at once, and the rest usually vest monthly after that.
  • Exercise window: stock options give you the right to buy shares at a set price. If you leave, US companies usually give you 90 days to buy your vested options, in cash. You may owe tax before you can sell anything. Carta found that by late 2024, employees were buying only about a third of their vested “in the money” options (ones worth more than the price to buy them). Cost is a big reason. Buying your options can mean dipping into your savings.
  • Dilution: each funding round creates new shares, so your percentage shrinks. In Index’s example, 1% at seed becomes about 0.4% by Series D, though the stake can still be worth more in dollars.
  • Preferred shares: investors usually hold preferred shares, which the company pays out first when it sells. Employees hold common shares, so a low-price sale can leave little for you.

The size of the grant matters too. Index’s US benchmark puts the average seed-stage grant for a senior engineer at about 1% of the company, though its figures cover all sectors, so treat that as a rough guide. Say you’re offered 0.5% and the founder is aiming for a $1 billion exit. That’s $5 million on paper. If the company raises three more rounds and each one sells 20% of the company, your stake shrinks to about 0.26%, or around $2.6 million. Preferred shares get paid first, so the real figure could be lower. Tax on equity depends on your situation.

Early Stage vs. Late Stage: How Company Stage Changes Your Odds

A 1% stake at a seed-stage company is a very different prospect from 1% at a Series C company. At a well-funded late-stage company, equity works more like a bonus on a fair salary. At seed, equity is the startup’s way of asking you to stay for the long haul. It only pays off if the company survives several more funding rounds.

Picture two job offers. One is from a Series C space company that has raised hundreds of millions of dollars and plans to go public in the next few years. Shares there are more likely to pay out, and sooner. The other is from a Series A company that has just raised its first big round and may be several years away from any payout. Those shares could end up worth far more, or nothing at all.

Early-stage companies are also the ones most likely to close down. In 2024, 966 US startups on Carta’s platform shut down, up from 769 the year before, and SimpleClosure found that 74% of shutdowns since 2023 were at pre-seed or seed. 

Firefly Aerospace is an example of a startup that did make it big. When it went public on Nasdaq in August 2025, employees holding stock could finally sell it, once the usual lock-up period after an IPO had passed.

Questions to Ask a Space Startup Founder Before You Sign

Now put what you know about equity to use in your interviews. A recruiter can tell you a lot about the role, but only the founder can tell you what your shares could be worth and how likely they are to pay out. A founder who’s confident in the business should be happy to answer questions like these:

  • When do my shares start to vest, and is there a cliff?
  • What percentage of the fully diluted company is this? That means counting every share and option, including ones set aside for future hires.
  • If the company sold, how much would investors get paid before employees?
  • How long would I have to buy my options if I left?
  • What are my shares worth in your best case, your expected case and your worst case?
  • How many months of runway do you have, and is this role paid for by a customer contract or by the next round?
  • Have any employees been able to sell shares yet?

If a founder can’t answer these clearly, take note. One candidate we’ve worked with came to us after they relocated for an early-stage company that folded only months later. Our guide to how to tell if a space startup is a safe move covers the other signs to check before you sign.

Space Startup Equity: Ask for the Numbers First

A big percentage and a big IPO target sound great in a pitch. But don’t forget that what you keep depends on the terms of the grant and on whether the company even gets there. 

Before you weigh the shares, make sure the salary can support you and anyone who relies on you. Our guide to weighing startup equity against salary shows you how to work that out. And if you’re thinking about your next move, take a look at the space roles we’re hiring for right now.

This blog is general information, not financial or tax advice. Everyone’s situation is different, so talk to a qualified financial advisor before you make decisions about equity.

Startup Equity vs. Salary: Is a Space Startup Worth the Pay Cut?

For many engineers, the reason to join a space startup is the work, even when weighing startup equity vs. salary means earning less. On a small team, you could own far more of the system than you would at a large company, and grow faster with it. Space startups raised close to record venture money in the first half of 2026, so more engineers are getting offers like this, with equity as part of the package.

The trade-off is usually salary. Startups have to make each funding round last until the next milestone, so they often pay less in cash and offer shares to make up for it. Those shares could be worth a lot in seven years, or nothing. Weighing startup equity vs. salary comes down to whether the pay cut works for you, and that’s what this blog covers.

What You Get at a Space Startup Besides Equity

The difference is scope. At a startup, a small team owns most of the system. Of all the reasons engineers give us for wanting to move, more hands-on technical work comes up most often. Frustration with red tape at bigger companies is another big one.

At a large space company, your work is often part of a much bigger program. On a small team, an RF engineer could end up leading RF design for the whole system. If that’s what you want, the equity doesn’t need to make you rich for the move to be worth it.

Space Startup Funding in 2026: Plenty of Money, Few Payouts

By the end of June 2026, space tech startups had already raised more venture money than in the whole of 2025: $11.3 billion against $10.1 billion, according to PitchBook. More funded startups mean more offers with equity attached.

However much a startup raises, your shares only pay out when someone buys the company, it goes public, or it lets employees sell shares to investors. Going public is still rare in space, and shares aren’t always worth that much when it happens.

Astra went public through a SPAC (a listed shell company that merges with a private one) in 2021 at a $2.1 billion valuation. By late 2022, its shares were more than 96% below their peak, and in 2024 its founders took it private at 50 cents a share. The US has plenty of space startups, but not many engineers have cashed in their shares. Some will, and you can learn a lot about which companies are likely to get there before you sign. 

Startup Equity vs Salary: Start With What You Can Live On

Before you look at the equity, work out whether the money in your bank account makes sense. Don’t forget to take into account the cost of living if you are relocating for a space role. Equity can take years to pay out, if it pays out at all.

Our consultants find the engineers who suit equity-heavy offers are often willing to earn $30,000 to $50,000 less than they could elsewhere. Where you live matters too. Your money goes a lot further in Huntsville, Alabama, home to NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, than in the Seattle area, home to Blue Origin and Amazon’s Kuiper, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. 

What You Leave Behind at a Bigger Space Company

Weigh the startup offer against everything you’d leave, your salary cut included. At a large or newly public company, part of your pay is stock you can sell, plus grants that keep vesting while you stay. Walking out means saying goodbye to unvested grants.

SpaceX listed on Nasdaq in June 2026 at $135 a share. On August 6, up to 911.5 million shares held by employees and early investors became available to sell. Even before the IPO, SpaceX ran regular tender offers that let employees sell shares to approved investors, at $185 a share in December 2024.

That’s stock you can turn into a deposit on a house. A seed-stage startup offers a different trade: shares that could be worth far more later, though you may not be able to sell them for years. Stock you got as part of your pay is hard to give up, and it’s one of the biggest reasons we see engineers turn startups down.

Look at the whole package too. Health insurance and retirement plans can look different at a small company, so ask for the details early so that nothing surprises you at the offer stage.

Who a Space Startup Equity Offer Suits

The right call depends more on your situation than on how exciting the company is. It comes down to how many people rely on your income and how much savings you have to fall back on.

The engineers we see make this move well tend to be five to eight years into their careers, want more ownership than they have now, and have room in their budget to earn less for a few years. If your family depends on every paycheck, a pay cut costs you more. We know this is a hard decision, and it’s fine to decide the timing is wrong.

Startup Equity vs. Salary: Weigh the Salary First

Shares can’t buy groceries, but under the right circumstances they’re still worth having. Decide on your bottom line, and be clear about what you’d leave behind. After that, it comes down to the founder: do you understand their vision, and do you believe in it enough to take the trade? If you’re thinking about your next move, take a look at the space roles we’re hiring for right now.

This blog is general information, not financial or tax advice. Everyone’s situation is different, so talk to a qualified financial advisor before you make decisions about equity.

Want a Job in Space? Start With the Roles Companies Can’t Fill

“Space experience required.” It’s the line that stops a lot of good engineers from applying for a job in space. But the space industry has a well-documented skills gap, and that gap is your way in. Only about 3% of the nearly 3 million engineers in the US work in industries that support space, according to RAND, and space companies are looking for a very specific profile.

The shortage is getting harder to ignore. Investors worldwide put $23 billion into space technology in the 12 months to mid-2026, more than double the year before, according to the Seraphim Space Index. Most of those funded companies want engineers with years of experience, and the US Office of Space Commerce found mid-career roles are the hardest to fill. Those engineers are usually settled in good jobs, often with other offers on the table.

Why The Space Talent Shortage Works in Your Favor

For some roles, flight heritage (experience taking hardware from design through to flight) is non-negotiable. Where it isn’t essential, and where a role is too niche to fill from inside space, companies are open to people from other industries. 

Of the people we placed between January and September 2026, about six in ten came from outside the space industry, and more than a third came from industries with no link to aerospace at all. If you’re looking for a job in space, these are the roles companies told us they struggled to fill:

The Hardest Space Jobs to Fill, and Who Could Fill Them

RF/Microwave Engineer

What the Role Involves

RF (radio frequency) engineers design the hardware that lets a spacecraft send and receive signals, such as the receivers and transceivers that carry data between orbit and the ground. At a startup, you’d often lead RF design for the whole system rather than owning one small part of it.

How to Make Your Experience Count

This is one of the most niche skills in US space hiring, and hands-on hardware work usually means time on site. Engineers who’ve designed RF hardware, in defense, radar or similar systems, are the closest match. 

Companies will look past the job title to the hardware you’ve actually designed and tested, so lead with that. On one search we worked in September, the client opened up to hybrid working and to people with about 80% of the experience on the spec, after holding out for a near-perfect match.

GNC and Avionics Engineer

What the Role Involves

GNC (guidance, navigation and control) engineers design the onboard systems that track a spacecraft’s position and keep it on course, whether that’s a rocket climbing to orbit or a satellite holding its place. Avionics engineers design the onboard electronics, from the system architecture to command and data handling and power.

How to Make Your Experience Count

Companies we spoke to in September want the process discipline of traditional aerospace combined with the pace of a newer space company. That means engineers from traditional aerospace and defense already bring part of what these companies are looking for.

Leadership roles here do ask for space-mission experience, so the way in is often a hands-on engineering role.

Thermal Engineer

What the Role Involves

Thermal engineers keep every part of a spacecraft within a safe temperature range, from launch through to orbit. You’d model how heat moves through the vehicle and run thermal tests to check the hardware can handle space.

How to Make Your Experience Count

Companies told us a “thermal engineer” title says very little about whether someone has worked at the level of a whole vehicle. If you’re coming from another industry with hands-on thermal test experience, spell out what you tested, at what scale and how far it went. The job title won’t do that work for you.

Test and Analysis Engineer

What the Role Involves

Dynamics and shock analysts work out whether hardware will survive the shock and vibration of launch. Some companies that used to outsource this work are now bringing it in-house, which is creating new roles. 

How to Make Your Experience Count

The specialist pool is tiny. In one state, a keyword search for a role we worked on this year dropped to about seven people. If you’ve done vibration or structural testing outside space, this role is worth a look. With so few specialists around, companies have good reason to consider people who’ve done other kinds of testing. In your application, connect your test work to the hardware the company is building.

Satellite Network Engineer

What the Role Involves

Network engineers at satellite companies build and run the networks that move data between satellites and the customers on the ground.

How to Make Your Experience Count

Of all the roles here, this one is the most open to people from outside space. One role we worked on this year needed no space background at all. The most important part of the role was telecoms experience. Roles like this are often contract positions, which can be a lower-risk way to get space onto your résumé.

Veterans are one of the biggest sources of space talent

The US military was the single biggest source of the people we placed this year. The US Office of Space Commerce says veterans bring skills and security clearances space companies need, but there’s no clear system yet for matching military roles to space jobs. If you’re leaving the military, programs like VetsinTech’s Vets in Space can help with the matching.

Where to Start if You Want a Space Role

The roles that are hardest to fill are the ones where a company has the most reason to look at someone like you. If your background lines up with one of the roles we’ve mentioned, lead with what you’ve built and tested, and let the work make the case that a job title can’t.

Once you’re in, the next step is building the experience that makes you hard to replace. If one of these roles sounds like your next job in space, take a look at the space roles we’re hiring for right now.

Four Signs (Besides Funding) a Space Startup Is a Safe Bet

Candidates weighing an offer from an early-stage space company instinctively check the funding before they sign. But funding alone doesn’t tell you whether a space startup is a good move. Plenty of well-funded space startups still haven’t made it, and the engineers who signed with them have had to start over.

Nearly half the companies we hired for in the last year were seed or Series A startups. More candidates are getting that early-stage call, and with so many new startups in the space economy, they’re asking whether it’s safe to sign on the dotted line.

CB Insights tracked 431 venture-backed companies that shut down since 2023. The companies in that group had raised an average of $11 million each. Of those companies, 70% folded when the money ran out. But CB Insights also found that running out of cash was rarely the real cause. Poor product-market fit and unsustainable unit economics are what dry up the capital in the first place. 

Virgin Orbit raised $228 million going public in 2021. It lost nine satellites in a failed launch in January 2023 and filed for bankruptcy three months later. The money ran out because the mission failed. After the launch, investors lost confidence and stopped funding the company.

Some of the examples below come from bigger companies, because their moves are public. The same signs show up at a 20-person startup, just on a smaller scale. 

Look Past a Space Startup’s Funding Round

A funding round tells you a company has money. That’s important for candidates deciding whether to join an early-stage startup in space. Over the last year, 78% of the roles we filled needed people on site at least some of the time, and 28% of the people we placed relocated for the job. If you move for a startup and it folds, you lose more than the job. 

But instead of asking how much money a company has, ask, “What’s changed since your last raise?” A raise shows that investors believe in the company’s plan. What’s changed since then shows whether the company is executing the plan. These four signs tell you whether a space startup is a safe bet, and you can check all of them yourself before you sign.

A Contract With a Deadline Beats Being Eligible to Bid

Ask your interviewer directly: is this role paid for by a customer contract or by the next funding round? Either answer can be fine. Plenty of solid space companies are running on investor money right now. But asking the question helps you understand the risk you’re taking on.

What a Named Deadline Means

Joining a contract vehicle (a pre-approved list of companies a customer like NASA can buy from) is a real milestone. It means a company has cleared NASA’s bar and is positioned to compete for missions. A specific deliverable with a deadline attached is simply the next stage along that same path: the work has been assigned and a paying customer is waiting.

NASA added Relativity’s Terran R to its Launch Services II contract in September, making it eligible for NASA missions ordered through mid-2030. That’s a strong signal in its own right; NASA doesn’t add companies it doesn’t take seriously.

Lunar Outpost is further along that same journey. NASA gave it $220 million in May 2026 to build Pegasus, its crewed lunar rover, due on the Moon by 2028. Both are good signs for a candidate. They just tell you slightly different things: one that NASA sees a company as a credible future partner, the other that the work and the deadline are already locked in. 

Investor Money vs. Customer Money

It’s important to know who’s paying for your role, because that tells you how secure the job is. Investors aren’t paying for a specific product. They’re putting money in because they think the company will be worth more later, and they want a piece of the pie when that happens. A contract means a paying customer. A customer like NASA is putting money behind a product it needs built.

If your role sits on a contract, a paying customer is waiting for the work. If it’s investor money alone, you’re building toward something the company is still hoping will pay off. Should that money run out before the company lands a customer, your job goes with it.

Companies Don’t Sign a Lease on a Maybe

Ask directly: is the space you’d be working in already under lease, or is the company still deciding where to put it? A company still figuring out its location isn’t necessarily a red flag. But a company with a signed lease is a safer bet.

What a Signed Lease Proves

Funding doesn’t come with a building attached. If you’re relocating for a role, check whether the company has signed a lease. The company has to pay rent and buildout costs whether it fills the building or not, so backing out gets expensive.

Cowboy Space leased 291,000 square feet in Kent, Washington, this year to build rockets and satellites in a former Costco distribution center. The company expects the site to bring roughly 300 new jobs to the region. That’s not the kind of space a company signs for a plan that might change.

An Executive Hire Comes With a Mandate

Before you sign, look up who’s joined the company’s leadership team recently and what the company hired them to do.

A company’s leadership tells you what’s coming next for the team you’d be joining. Nobody hires a CFO to formalize capital strategy for a team they want to cut.

Axiom Space brought on a new CFO and CIO this year, alongside a $525 million raise and international expansion into Japan and Switzerland. Its new CFO, Zach Gitomer, said the company needed “financial infrastructure, discipline, and capital strategy” for what it’s building next.

At a seed-stage space startup, you won’t see a new CFO. Look for the first senior hire outside engineering, like a head of operations or business development. It usually means the company is getting ready to grow.

Other Engineers Are Already Joining the Startup

Engineers talk to each other, and they often know which companies are worth joining before anyone else does. Payload found that more than twice as many people have moved from SpaceX to Blue Origin as the other way around. 

Check who’s already on the team and where they worked before. If people with good options chose this company, that’s a good sign. At a startup, the team is small enough to check in an afternoon. If early engineers left solid jobs at larger companies to join, they took a bigger risk than you’re being asked to take. 

Know What You’re Signing Up For at a Space Startup

Funding tells you a company can pay you for now. What you really need to know is whether the company behind the offer has a customer waiting on work, a building it’s committed to, leaders brought in to grow it, and engineers choosing to join. You can check most of this before you sign. If you’re thinking about your next move, take a look at the space roles we’re hiring for right now.

10 US Space Companies to Watch in 2026

Both startups and publicly listed companies are racing to build what space needs next. Some are building cheaper rockets. Others are building what happens after launch, from spacecraft that move cargo around in orbit to satellites that watch over and defend what’s already up there.

Here are 10 companies to watch in 2026. We picked these ten because the money is already turning into something real, whether that’s a contract with a deadline or a new factory.

Under each company, we’ve noted what it has already done to earn its place, and where we expect it to hire, based on its public announcements.

The Race to Reusable Rockets

Getting to orbit is still the most expensive part of going to space. These three companies all have rockets coming together right now.

Stoke Space (Kent, WA)

Stoke is building Nova Pathfinder, a rocket designed so that every part of it can fly again. It’s targeting early 2027 for the first launch, with a larger version, Nova Block 2, planned for 2029.

Why it made the list: Stoke raised about $1 billion in September 2026. It shipped three of the seven engines its first stage needs for testing in July, and its Cape Canaveral launch pad is mostly complete.

Where we’d expect hiring: Propulsion engineering, structures

Relativity Space (Long Beach, CA)

Relativity Space is actively developing Terran R, a reusable medium-to-heavy-lift rocket designed for larger payloads with a targeted debut in late 2026. While the company’s second stage has arrived at NASA’s Stennis Space Center for testing, the first-stage booster is currently undergoing qualification testing at the factory. 

Why it made the list: NASA added Terran R to its launch services contract in September 2026, making it eligible to compete for NASA missions. All 13 of its first-stage engines have passed acceptance testing and are being installed.

Where we’d expect hiring: Propulsion, launch operations

Rocket Lab (Long Beach, CA)

Rocket Lab’s Neutron is built to launch whole batches of satellites at once, with a first stage that lands and flies again. It hasn’t flown yet. A test failure in January pushed its debut back, and Rocket Lab is now aiming to launch by the end of 2026.

Why it made the list: Kepler Communications booked a dedicated Neutron launch in August 2026, planned for no earlier than 2028. The deal helps fill Neutron’s schedule through the end of the decade, with customers committing to a rocket that’s still in testing.

Where we’d expect hiring: Propulsion, structures, launch operations

The Real Growth Is in What Happens After Liftoff

Getting a payload to orbit is only half the job now. A second wave of companies is building the infrastructure for what happens in orbit. That includes moving spacecraft between orbits, powering computing in space and putting vehicles on the Moon.

Impulse Space (Redondo Beach, CA)

Impulse builds the vehicles that move spacecraft between orbits once a rocket drops them off. Its next vehicle, Helios, is larger and designed to carry payloads all the way toward 

geostationary orbit.

Why it made the list: Impulse raised a $500 million Series D in June 2026. Its Mira vehicle has already flown multiple missions. At the time of the raise, Impulse had more than doubled its headcount in a year and had over 200 roles open.

Where we’d expect hiring: Propulsion, GNC, spacecraft systems

Cowboy Space (San Carlos, CA)

AI needs huge amounts of electricity, and data centers on the ground are running short of power. Cowboy Space wants to put them in orbit instead, running on solar power. It’s building its own rocket to get them there, and once in orbit, the top part of the rocket becomes the data center. The first engine test fire is planned for later this year in 2026.

Why it made the list: Cowboy Space raised a $275 million Series B in May 2026. It has taken over a former Costco warehouse in Kent, Washington, where it expects to add 300 jobs.

Where we’d expect hiring: Propulsion, hardware production, manufacturing

Lunar Outpost (Golden, CO)

NASA’s upcoming Moon crews will be prospecting for resources and scouting sites for a permanent base. They’ll need something to drive, and Lunar Outpost is one of two companies building it. Its Pegasus rover, developed with General Motors and Goodyear, carries two astronauts and can also drive itself or be steered from Earth. Delivery to NASA is planned for November 2027.

Why it made the list: NASA selected Lunar Outpost in May 2026 to build a crewed Moon rover under a $220 million contract. The company is already building full-scale drivable prototypes for astronaut training while the flight hardware goes through qualification.

Where we’d expect hiring: Mechanical and vehicle engineering, mission systems

Watching, Listening and Defending From Orbit

The third group builds the systems that watch, talk to or defend what’s already up there, and military demand is pushing much of that hiring.

CesiumAstro (Austin, TX)

Most satellites need a way to talk, and CesiumAstro builds that part. It makes phased-array antennas and radios for other companies’ satellites, and its own satellites too. The company is now scaling up to build them at much higher volumes.

Why it made the list: CesiumAstro raised $470 million in February 2026 to fund a new headquarters and factory outside Austin.

Where we’d expect hiring: RF and phased-array engineering, manufacturing

True Anomaly (Centennial, CO)

True Anomaly’s Jackal is a spacecraft that flies up to other satellites to inspect them. The company holds a contract to supply Jackals to the Space Force’s GHOST-R program, and plans to grow from 250 people to more than 500 by the end of 2026.

Why it made the list: In July 2026, 61 hours after the Space Force gave the go-ahead, Jackal found its target in orbit, circled it and photographed it up close, beating the military’s 72-hour goal. True Anomaly also raised a $650 million Series D in April.

Where we’d expect hiring: GNC, autonomy software, cleared roles

AST SpaceMobile (Midland, TX)

AST SpaceMobile’s satellites connect directly to ordinary smartphones, with no special hardware. It’s aiming to have 45 satellites in orbit by early 2027 and wants to build six a month.

Why it made the list: As of August 2026, AST SpaceMobile had about 25 satellites in orbit and more than 60 mobile carriers signed on, including AT&T and Verizon.

Where we’d expect hiring: RF, flight software, ground systems

Voyager Technologies (Denver, CO)

The US wants a missile-defense shield with interceptors stationed in space, a program called Golden Dome. Those interceptors need propulsion, and Voyager supplies it: thrusters that let satellites maneuver in orbit, and solid propellants that help fire their motors. It’s also building lunar landers and a commercial space station set to follow the ISS.

Why it made the list: Voyager reported $84.3 million in Golden Dome-related awards in Q2 2026, and its order backlog reached a record $335.5 million.

Where we’d expect hiring: Propulsion, energetics, defense systems

If you’re looking at your next move in space, a big funding round is a good sign, but it’s only the start. The companies worth watching are the ones with something to show for it: a customer waiting on a delivery date, hardware in testing, a factory being built, a team that’s growing. Those are the companies that will need people, and soon. We work with space companies hiring across propulsion, GNC, RF, software and more. See what’s open.

Top 5 Moves in Space This Month: What September Means for Hiring

Stoke Space raised $1 billion this month to build a second rocket before its first one has even flown. Four more space companies made moves just as telling this month. Here’s what happened, and what each one means for hiring.

1. Stoke Space Raised $1 Billion to Launch Its Reusable Nova Rocket

Stoke Space closed a $1 billion Series E this month to speed up its fully reusable Nova rocket, which the company wants to fly by 2027. The money also covers:

  • Building a second, much bigger vehicle, Nova Block 2, carrying roughly five times the payload of Nova’s reusable configuration, aimed at 2029
  • A sevenfold expansion of the Moses Lake, Washington, test site, from 75 to 550 acres
  • New payload processing facilities at Cape Canaveral to support both rockets at once

What It Means for Space

Nova is designed to recover both the booster and the upper stage, something no rocket has done operationally yet. Nova Block 2 is comparable to SpaceX’s Falcon 9, except that Falcon 9 isn’t fully reusable.

SpaceX’s own path to full reusability is Starship, aimed at a completely different scale of mission. SpaceX doesn’t expect to retire Falcon 9 until Starship is flying reliably several times a week. Stoke is betting it can bring full reusability to Falcon 9’s size class well before SpaceX has reason to build something similarly small and reusable.

Where the Jobs Are Headed

Stoke has around 400 people today and needs to scale fast. That means:

  • Growing propulsion, structures, avionics and GNC (guidance, navigation and control) engineering teams to run two rocket programs at once
  • Hiring the technicians needed to operate Moses Lake at seven times its current size

It also puts Stoke in direct competition with Rocket Lab, Firefly and Relativity for the same small pool of people who’ve actually worked on a reusable launch vehicle before. Nobody has built one that’s fully reusable yet, so that pool of people barely exists. If that’s you, expect more calls.

2. SpaceX Posted Its First Job Listing for a Launch Site That Doesn’t Exist Yet

SpaceX put up its first job posting for a proposed launch site in Vermilion Parish, Louisiana. The state expects the project to bring more than $100 billion in investment, about 3,000 direct jobs over ten years, and 8,100 additional indirect jobs for contractors and vendors. Construction starts by the end of 2027, with SpaceX targeting first launches for 2029.

What It Means for Space

Vermilion Parish itself has no existing space workforce. What the parish does have is the Gulf Coast’s existing heavy industry: shipbuilders like Conrad Shipyard, oil and gas majors such as Chevron, and the logistics hub at Port Fourchon, all of which produce welders, pipefitters, electricians and heavy-equipment operators used to working on large, hazardous industrial sites.

Where the Jobs Are Headed

Most of these roles have to be filled now. Site design, environmental permitting and range-safety planning all have to be finished before a rocket ever reaches the pad. That leaves SpaceX with two problems to solve:

  • SpaceX has to recruit specialist roles (GNC, propulsion, launch and pad operations leadership) nationally, competing with Blue Origin and every other space company for people willing to relocate to a parish that’s never had a space employer
  • For site trades (welders, electricians, pipefitters and riggers), SpaceX will be competing with Louisiana’s oil, gas and shipbuilding industry for people with transferable skills

3. Rocket Lab Fully Funded Its $8 Billion Iridium Acquisition

Rocket Lab closed out the financing behind its $8 billion acquisition of Iridium this month, completing a $1.94 billion stock offering to get there. The deal hands Rocket Lab a global satellite network with more than 2.55 million subscribers, plus government, defense and commercial customers already paying for it. It also comes with the spectrum and infrastructure to run that network.

What It Means for Space

Most launch companies stick to launch. Rocket Lab has spent years buying its way into building spacecraft too, and Iridium adds something bigger: an already-profitable network. Iridium made $871.7 million in revenue last year at a 57% operating margin.

Instead of aiming to make cheaper rockets, Rocket Lab is diversifying by looking at what happens after launch. That means running the satellites, selling the communications services they provide, and collecting revenue from customers long after the rocket’s gone.

Where the Jobs Are Headed

Rocket Lab isn’t just buying satellites; it’s buying an operating business it has never run before. That means:

  • Program and integration management roles to fold two companies into one without impacting a network 2.55 million subscribers are relying on
  • Satellite operations and GNC hires to run the combined business at a scale Rocket Lab didn’t need before

4. NASA Gave Relativity Space a Contract That Doesn’t Start Until 2030

NASA added Relativity Space’s Terran R to its Launch Services II contract this month, making it eligible for NASA missions assigned between now and 2030, for launches that have to happen by 2032.

The catch: Terran R hasn’t flown yet. Relativity is still building its launch pad at Cape Canaveral and a new engine test site at NASA’s Stennis Space Center in Mississippi.

What It Means for Space

Four years sounds like plenty of runway, but proving a new rocket reliable enough for NASA missions could eat up most of it. Relativity has to get Terran R flying, then flying repeatedly, well before the contract starts sending business its way.

Where the Jobs Are Headed

That means Relativity needs to build out propulsion, structures, avionics and launch operations teams now, years ahead of the first paying mission.

It also puts Relativity in the same hiring pool as Blue Origin, ULA, Firefly and Stoke: all racing to build a similar class of rocket, all drawing from the same small group of people who have already done it.

5. York Space Systems Landed Another Constellation Contract

York Space Systems, based in Denver, was named prime contractor for Tomorrow.io’s new weather constellation this month. The deal is worth $187 million to start, covering dozens of satellites carrying weather sensors. As prime, York owns the entire program. It’s building the satellites, integrating partners’ sensors and answering for the whole constellation itself.

What It Means for Space

That kind of ownership means York carries all the risk too. If a sensor doesn’t work or the ground systems fail, that’s York’s problem to fix. Responsibility like that needs serious production capacity, which is why York has already put over $755 million into its factory.

Where the Jobs Are Headed

This also means York needs to grow its in-house teams: the engineers who build the satellites, the ones who handle how they communicate, and the ones who run them once they’re in orbit.

That puts York up against other satellite builders like Terran Orbital, Blue Canyon and Millennium Space, who are all hiring the same kind of people. It’s another sign that satellite-building jobs keep growing in Denver.

What These Five Moves Signal

These five moves show that hiring starts years before the mission goes live. Without a talent pipeline, there is no mission. Talk to us for advice on where to start.

The Future of Space Depends on Today’s Junior Talent, and Hiring Managers Will Decide It

Space companies are hiring hand to mouth: filling this year’s seats with people who already know the work. In the space industry, the talent pool of experienced engineers is finite. If hiring managers in the space industry keep passing the buck on investing in younger talent, the pipeline will eventually dry up. 

At the moment, senior talent dominates the space arena, and a lot of that talent will retire out of the workforce over the next decade. Our own data confirms it. 

What Our Interview Data Shows

Of our placements in Q2, 49% were for senior, principal or staff roles, 23% for lead or manager roles, 19% for director, VP or C-suite roles, and just 9% for junior, associate or technician roles. 

That means almost everyone else our clients hired had already done the job before, somewhere else. The rare exceptions are people companies decided, for once, to take a chance on. Actively attracting and mentoring junior talent is particularly important for startups in this industry. But only a next generation of experienced, ready-to-step-in people will fill those gaps.

Why Space Companies Want Experience Over Potential 

At EVONA, we understand why space companies, particularly startups, prefer experienced talent. Space is pulling in more investment than it used to, particularly since SpaceX proved the commercial model works.

More capital means more competition to get a product to market, and investors want to see their money go toward people who can deliver immediately. That pressure helps explain what we’re seeing in our own numbers: even when a role is posted as junior, it often goes to someone who’s already done adjacent work, because a proven candidate is the safer bet when a hire has to justify itself to a board next quarter. 

What “Junior” Really Means on a Space Job Description 

Often, the job title on the JD says “junior” but the requirements don’t. A junior posting that asks for 2 to 3 years of space-specific experience isn’t really a junior posting. It’s a mid-level posting with a discount attached, and it locks out the exact people junior roles are meant to bring in.

This is the tension we keep running into with clients. Everyone wants a junior candidate, but nobody wants to spend the time training one. 

Why Flight Heritage Makes Space Hiring Different 

Space hiring is different from almost every other technical industry here, for four reasons. 

What Flight Heritage Actually Requires

A self-taught software developer can build something real on their own time and use it to prove they can do the job. In space, that doesn’t exist. What space companies actually want is flight heritage: proof someone has worked on hardware that’s flown. You cannot get that without a company deciding, first, to let you near it. There’s no side project that substitutes for it. 

Very Few Companies Can Give Someone Their First Shot

The number of companies that can plausibly give someone that first shot is small to begin with. In most industries, if one employer won’t train you, a dozen others in adjacent industries might. In space, the list of companies with the budget, the programs, and the appetite to take a chance on someone unproven is short. If none of them will do it, there’s nowhere else to go get that experience instead. 

Long Program Timelines Mean Fewer Reps per Career

Program timelines make it worse again. A single spacecraft program can run for years. An engineer might see two or three complete programs across an entire career, from requirements through operations. Compare that to industries where people ship and iterate every week and build a decade of judgment in two years. In space, each junior hire is a slower, bigger bet, which is why companies avoid it.

Clearance Requirements Narrow the Pool Again

Clearance requirements narrow that pool of willing companies even further.  A meaningful share of space roles require security clearance, which rules out training candidates from the outside even when a company might otherwise be willing.

Put those four things together, and an aging space workforce becomes a question of national capability: whether the country doing this work will have anyone qualified to do it in twenty years. That skills gap already exists. It only gets wider if the industry keeps undervaluing junior talent.

Fresh Grads Are a Real Advantage for Startups

More Hands, Fewer Dollars

Junior engineers cost less, which matters more at a startup compared to the primes. A team that can only afford two senior hires can often afford five junior ones instead, freeing up senior engineers’ time from the testing, documentation and integration work that doesn’t need their judgment.

Fresh grads also arrive with current knowledge. Engineering degrees today lean hard into the software, modeling and data tools the space industry is short on, so a new graduate often walks in with the most up-to-date industry knowledge. 

An Investment in Your Future Talent Pipeline

There’s a longer payoff too. A startup that trains its own junior engineers isn’t just filling jobs reactively. It’s also building the mid-career skills it’ll need in five years, instead of fighting every other company for the same shrinking pool of experienced hires. 

The Culture Fit Benefit

Someone coming from a prime is used to programs that run for years and decisions that go through several rounds of sign-off. That’s a different rhythm from a startup, where a small team needs to move fast and make calls without waiting for a formal review or sign-off from several layers of management. A junior engineer with no prior experience can often slot into a startup’s pace more easily from day one. 

What Founders Can Do to Shape the Future of Space

“Space is for everyone, yet many people see it as an area that needs a special degree.”

Tom Kelly, Co-Founder at EVONA

Apprenticeships come closest to solving the flight-heritage problem, because employers build them to do exactly that: paid, employer-embedded training that doesn’t require someone to already have the experience they’re there to build.

Two US Programs Are Already Closing the Gap 

Apprenti runs registered aerospace and space apprenticeships in the US built to counter this exact shortage, pairing new hires with mentors and structured, hands-on training instead of asking them to arrive already proven.

The Arizona Space Grant Consortium runs a smaller, more targeted version of the same idea. Its NASA-funded internship program places undergraduates with small to mid-sized space companies for a semester, paid, working around 10 hours a week on real project work tied to their field of study. 

Startups doing things like lunar resource mining, small modular reactors and high-altitude balloon platforms make up almost the entire current lineup. That’s exactly the kind of company we’ve been talking about. It’s not a full graduate scheme, but it proves the model scales down. A startup doesn’t need a huge budget to give a junior engineer their first real project. Given how rarely we’re running junior interviews right now, building even a handful of structured paths like these into a hiring plan isn’t a nice extra. It’s close to the minimum effort required. 

That conviction goes back to EVONA’s earliest days: bring in junior talent from a range of backgrounds, not just people who already have a specialized space pedigree. A strong team isn’t built by hiring every senior name that’s already worked at SpaceX. It’s built by finding people who fit the company’s values, then creating a real path for them to grow into the work. 

Talk to Us About Your Junior Hiring Strategy

If your team is trying to work out where junior talent actually fits into your hiring plan, that’s a conversation EVONA has with space companies every week. Get in touch, and we’ll walk through what a realistic junior intake looks like for your team, budget, and timeline.

The Senior Space Engineer You Need Doesn’t Have the Title Yet 

The primes have a promotion problem, and it’s about to become your hiring advantage. In space, experience is hard to come by, but ability is everywhere. Plenty of engineers can already do the job. It’s just that their resume doesn’t say so yet. The answer to that gap: the step-up hire. 

What Is a Step-Up Hire? 

You’ve got a spot for a senior engineer. And somewhere inside a bigger company, with fewer opportunities, the engineer you need has been ready for a while. They’re the ones junior engineers go to for advice before anyone else. They’re doing jobs no one assigned to them, like running the subsystem review, or catching a design flaw before it ever reaches a senior engineer’s desk. The step-up hire is the person you might overlook for a role because “senior” is not in their job title yet. That’s the person you need to hire. 

There Aren’t Enough Engineers to Begin With 

There aren’t enough engineers in this industry to begin with, let alone senior engineers who’ve seen a program from requirements through operations. That’s only one of the reasons that 95% of space companies report skills-related recruitment or retention challenges.

The average recruitment cycle takes about 10 weeks. That’s 10 weeks of work lost to recruitment. The skills shortage shows up the most in propulsion, avionics, and flight software, the disciplines with the fewest people who’ve carried a full program end to end.

Why Engineers Are Leaving for Commercial Tech

And turnover isn’t helping either. The engineers don’t always leave because they’re frustrated where they are. The space industry is also competing for talent with the commercial tech industry for aerospace-trained engineers by offering them more money and faster progression.

The Primes’ Promotion Ceiling is Your Opportunity

Finding and retaining engineers for the space industry is about knowing what makes them tick. Progression is one thing most engineers are looking for at a certain point. Larger companies, especially the primes, can’t always offer engineers their next step once they’re ready. A team of five or six engineers might only have room for one of them to move up. That means most of these engineers will have to either stay put and try again next year or think of moving elsewhere. 

A Senior at a Prime Isn’t a Senior at a Startup 

In our experience, a senior at a prime is not the same as a senior at a startup. Primes and startups both have their own challenges and advantages, and no company is perfect. It just depends on what you’re looking for as an engineer. 

Primes offer higher salaries and the career stability that startups can’t always promise. But there’s often a lot of red tape to deal with, and progression can be slow. A startup can offer a role that often doesn’t exist for engineers working inside a prime: hands-on technical leadership from day one, and a promotion timeline tied to how fast the company grows instead of how many seats are free in the org chart.

Management Track VS Staying Technical

Most engineers want responsibility and accountability. For ambitious engineers who love the tech, frustrations could start to build at the primes. 

People management and staying technical are two different paths when it comes to larger space companies. At a prime, leading a team often means signing off on someone else’s test plan, instead of running the test bench yourself. 

The Job Description Trap to Avoid

At EVONA, we often see founders responding to a difficult talent market by adding more things to the job description. The logic is something like “If the skills are hard to find, let me try to get more skills in one person”. Instead of helping, this costs you candidates.

The people who could fill your jobs are out there. They just might be waiting for their big break at a larger space company. This looks like standard engineers ready for senior, seniors ready for principal or lead.

How to Hire a Step-Up Candidate in Space Engineering

You might not be able to offer a prime salary but you can offer engineers something they won’t get at the primes: faster growth, while staying close to the tech they love. The step up is the offer.

The best way to approach this is to write the job description one level below where you’d naturally aim, and say so in the posting. In practice, that can mean rewriting the posting itself: describe the role as one for someone ready to become a Senior Systems Engineer, with the day-one expectations spelled out for the first two quarters.

Sell the Ownership

Your job description is your pitch to the engineers you’re interviewing. Instead of focusing on years of experience in the job, tell a candidate exactly what they’ll own in the first six months. Lead with the scope of the role, and not just the compensation, because ownership is the thing they won’t get by staying where they are. 

Most founders already know they can’t outbid a prime on salary, but an offer isn’t only about money and the trimmings. It’s also about the opportunity to grow and the exposure to helping build a company – and the tech – from the ground up. 

Don’t Forget to Screen for Culture

Screen for the transition instead of the years. Look for fast-paced or chaotic project work, side projects that show real interest in the industry, and evidence someone can operate without a structure telling them what to do next. Ten years at one company only matters if the instincts for a startup aren’t there too.

That step up works best with support around it. Pair the promotion with someone who’s done the role before, even if that’s a fractional advisor or a former colleague brought in for a few hours a month. The jump is real. It doesn’t have to be solo.

Every recruiter working the space market right now sees the same thing: strong candidates are getting multiple offers within days, not weeks. The founders who move first on the step-up pitch are the ones filling roles while everyone else is still waiting for a résumé that was never going to show up. The step-up candidates are already out there, waiting on a job description that actually speaks to them. See what EVONA can find for you.

How Space Startups Should Hire at Every Stage: From Seed to IPO 

If you want to grow a successful space startup, you need to hire like you mean it. Who you hire, and how, will determine your success. The space companies that make it from seed to IPO change tactics at every stage based on the challenge before them.

Every stage tests something different. Seed asks if you can build the thing at all. Series A asks if what you built has legs to scale. Finally, Series B asks if you can grow faster than everyone else on the same mission. Hiring for the stage you’re at builds proof. Are you hiring for proof, or hiring to fill a gap? 

Is Your Hiring Model Changing With You?

We’ve worked with clients from their first seed round through to a public listing. No two companies followed the same path, but all of them kept adapting their hiring to whatever problem the stage brought.

A pre-seed founder and a Series C founder are solving the same underlying problem. They need the right people for the job, but under very different constraints. One is protecting eighteen to twenty-four months of cash. The other is banking on a board’s confidence in how fast they can execute.

Sticking to the same hiring plan at every stage could lead to either spending money you don’t have early on, or moving too slowly once the company is scaling. Space companies looking to scale fast need to rethink their hiring approach every few months by asking themselves: “Does the model match the moment?”

Pre-Seed and Seed: Fractional Leadership Without the Commitment

At seed stage, few companies can justify a full-time CFO, COO, or Head of Ops, even though they can’t do without the expertise. This is where fractional leadership saves the day. That means a part-time CFO who’s raised capital before, or a fractional COO who’s already dealt with the kind of problem most first-time space founders haven’t: export control. 

Many space startups only discover their ITAR obligations once they try to hire a foreign national engineer, and the penalties for getting it wrong run up to $1 million per violation. With fractional hires, you’ll get experienced judgment for a few hours a week instead of a full salary.

We see founders bring in fractional operators with a plan to convert them to a full-time hire once they can justify it. It’s also why we built Fraction, our platform connecting founders with fractional executives across deep tech, defense, and space, so you can find the right senior expertise regardless of who happens to be in your network.

Fresh Off the Round: Spend Investor Money Wisely

The weeks after you close a round are when the math matters most. Hire someone permanent before you’re sure you need them, and you’re spending your investor’s money on a guess. Space hardware roles are especially expensive guesses: a senior propulsion or avionics hire can cost $200,000 to $300,000 once you include salary, benefits, and overhead.

This is where contract hiring can help. We’re seeing more founders bring in a contractor first. We’ll handle the payroll, so you don’t have to commit to a huge cost yet. It buys the company time to find out if the role really makes sense. If it does, the contract then converts to a permanent hire. 

Series A to B: Hiring for Good vs. Staying Flexible 

As you move through Series A and into B, the test is about whether you can scale what you built, reliably. As you start scaling, it becomes clear which roles you can’t live without. Those roles are worth hiring for directly, through a focused, headhunter-led search. But that doesn’t solve the volume problem you’ll be sitting with at this point. 

With multiple open roles at once, even a strong internal recruiter runs out of hours in the day. In space, that volume problem usually comes off the back of a big government contract win. SpaceX alone has picked up more than $7 billion in Pentagon contracts this year. 

On a startup’s scale, landing even one contract can turn a handful of open roles into a full team almost overnight. That’s why we embed directly into your team, working as part of your in-house hiring effort. That means your hiring capacity grows with demand, saving the cost of a permanent hiring team.

Series C and Beyond: When Diligence Matters More Than Speed

By the time you’re closing later rounds or approaching IPO, the hires that matter most are senior, and getting one wrong costs more than a missed engineering deadline. This year’s SpaceX IPO, the largest in history, is already pulling a new wave of space companies toward the same milestone. 

The test isn’t about growth anymore. It’s whether your leadership can hold up under scrutiny. A bad C-suite hire costs a board’s confidence and months of momentum you don’t get back. This is where Executive Search comes in: partner-led searches based on deep research, and built to get the decision right the first time.

The Takeaway

None of these approaches should be used without considering where you’re at. The hiring model needs to match the moment you’re in. If you’re not sure where your own hiring maturity sits right now, that’s exactly the kind of conversation we have with founders every week. Get in touch and we’ll help you figure it out.